When considering a hair transplant, choosing the right technique is just as important as choosing the right clinic.
Gone are the days of obvious “plug” transplants and linear scars.
Modern techniques—FUE, DHI, and Sapphire—offer minimally invasive solutions with natural results.
But with clinics aggressively marketing each method, how do you choose? The answer lies in understanding your hair loss pattern, aesthetic priorities, and lifestyle constraints
At Allesta Health Group, we offer multiple advanced techniques — FUE, DHI, and Sapphire — tailored to meet each patient’s individual hair restoration goals.
Next, we’ll break down what makes each method unique and help you determine which is the best fit for your needs.
FUE Hair Transplant (Follicular Unit Extraction)
FUE is one of the most popular hair transplant methods worldwide. It involves extracting individual hair follicles from the donor area (usually the back of the head) and implanting them in the recipient area.
Advantages
- Minimally invasive
- Leaves no linear scar
- Short recovery time
Best for
- Patients with mild to moderate hair loss
- Those who want a natural look without a noticeable scar
DHI (Direct Hair Implantation)
DHI is a more advanced variation of FUE. It uses a Choi implant pen to extract and implant hair follicles in one seamless step.
Advantages
- No need to shave the recipient area
- More precise placement of grafts
- Higher density possible
Best for
- Patients with limited hair loss
- Those looking for precision in hairline design
Sapphire FUE
Sapphire FUE uses blades made from synthetic sapphire instead of traditional steel.
Advantages
- Creates smaller, more precise incisions
- Less tissue damage
- Faster healing with less scarring
Best for
- Patients seeking faster recovery
- Those with sensitive skin or scarring concerns
Which One Is Right for You?
Choosing between FUE, DHI, or Sapphire hinges on your unique hair loss pattern, aesthetic goals, and practical priorities.
If your focus is a natural, undetectable hairline (especially for early-stage thinning or repair work), DHI’s precision implanter pen offers superior angle control and faster healing.
For extensive coverage (Norwood IV-VI) or budget-conscious restoration, traditional FUE delivers high graft volumes (4,000–5,000/session) at lower costs.
If you seek a balance of density and minimally invasive results, Sapphire FUE’s ultra-fine gemstone blades create tighter incisions for 15–20% higher density than metal FUE, ideal for mid-scalp or crown work.
Critical factors like surgeon expertise (verify ISHRS/ABHRS credentials), graft survival guarantees (≥90%), and clinic transparency (avoid “unlimited graft” traps) matter more than the tool itself.
In Turkey, accredited clinics tailor these techniques to your anatomy, combining artistry with value, so insist on a personalized graft plan during your consultation.
The ideal technique depends on several factors:
- Your hair loss pattern and stage
- Scalp and skin sensitivity
- Donor area density
- Your aesthetic goals
Our medical team at Allesta will assess your case individually to recommend the most suitable option.
Why Allesta?
Your choice should align with three key factors: the pattern of hair loss (early-stage thinning vs. advanced baldness), aesthetic priorities (natural hairlines vs. maximum coverage), and practical constraints like budget or recovery time.
While DHI leads in artistry for hairlines, FUE dominates for large-scale restoration, and Sapphire FUE enhances precision for demanding cases.
Patients choose Allesta for different reasons, such as:
- Multilingual staff to assist international patients
- Latest technologies in hair restoration
- Personalized care from consultation to aftercare
- Board-certified surgeons with years of experience
- We don’t just follow global standards — we set them.
Final Thoughts
Each hair transplant method — FUE, DHI, or Sapphire — offers unique advantages.
Choosing between FUE, DHI, and Sapphire isn’t about finding a “one-size-fits-all” solution—it’s about aligning technology with your unique needs.
FUE remains the workhorse for extensive restoration, DHI reigns supreme for artistic hairlines, and Sapphire FUE bridges precision with enhanced density.
Yet beyond the technique, your results hinge on two non-negotiables: surgeon expertise and clinic integrity. Turkey’s rise as a hair transplant epicenter isn’t just about affordability; it’s anchored in accredited clinics that merge advanced tech with rigorous safety protocols.
At Allesta, we help you choose the one that aligns best with your hair goals and medical profile. Contact us for a consultation and take the first step toward restoring your confidence.
FAQs
Is one technique “better” than others?
No—each suits different needs. DHI excels for hairlines; FUE/Sapphire handles large areas cost-effectively.
Does DHI hurt more than FUE?
Both use local anesthesia. DHI’s pen causes less tissue trauma, reducing post-op discomfort.
Can Sapphire blades be used with DHI?
No—Sapphire creates recipient sites; DHI implants directly. Some clinics combine them (“Sapphire-DHI”) for ultra-precise channel creation prior to Choi pen use.
How long do results last?
Permanent if taken from the “safe donor zone.” Non-transplanted hair may still thin over time.
Are Turkish clinics safe despite lower prices?
Yes, if accredited. Avoid budget factories; choose JCI/ISO-certified providers like Dr. Emrah Cinik Clinic or Sapphire Hair Clinic.
What if I need a repair from a bad transplant?
DHI often corrects pluggy hairlines or misangled grafts. Seek surgeons specializing in repairs
